<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SA Blog Awards, WTF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/</link>
	<description>Living Life. Running a Startup. Loving Technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: phillygirl</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>phillygirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>Quite the interesting read and this certainly generated a lot of comments ... as I think have all SA Blog Award posts in recent weeks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I too attended the Cool Running event last year and as events go, it was fairly dull. I enjoy the process of being a finalist tho, if only to get my blog exposed to a wider audience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the SA Blog Awards are pretty much a work-in-progress and each year some things improve and some stay the same. And it&#39;s only thru people discussing the flaws that things will improve.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to agree that I don&#39;t agree with Thought Leader being considered a "blog" ... I nominated a specific Thought Leader Blog in a certain (discarded) category and I think that&#39;s a far better approach. If Thought Leader itself should be a finalist (or winner) in any category it should be a category like: "Best SA Web Application for Weblogs" or similar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think there should definitely be more of a consensus regarding the award categories :) (I mean really, what kind of award system has a category for people writing about the awards?) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And for what it&#39;s worth I think it&#39;s okay that some categories were discarded. If only one SA blog got nominated for a category, firstly: perhaps the category wasn&#39;t very well thought out and secondly: where&#39;s the competition, it kinda defeats the purpose. But then again, I agree that there should&#39;ve been a bit of a better explanation around this decision!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite the interesting read and this certainly generated a lot of comments &#8230; as I think have all SA Blog Award posts in recent weeks.</p>
<p>I too attended the Cool Running event last year and as events go, it was fairly dull. I enjoy the process of being a finalist tho, if only to get my blog exposed to a wider audience.</p>
<p>I think the SA Blog Awards are pretty much a work-in-progress and each year some things improve and some stay the same. And it&#39;s only thru people discussing the flaws that things will improve.</p>
<p>I have to agree that I don&#39;t agree with Thought Leader being considered a &#8220;blog&#8221; &#8230; I nominated a specific Thought Leader Blog in a certain (discarded) category and I think that&#39;s a far better approach. If Thought Leader itself should be a finalist (or winner) in any category it should be a category like: &#8220;Best SA Web Application for Weblogs&#8221; or similar.</p>
<p>I think there should definitely be more of a consensus regarding the award categories <img src='http://justinhartman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> (I mean really, what kind of award system has a category for people writing about the awards?) </p>
<p>And for what it&#39;s worth I think it&#39;s okay that some categories were discarded. If only one SA blog got nominated for a category, firstly: perhaps the category wasn&#39;t very well thought out and secondly: where&#39;s the competition, it kinda defeats the purpose. But then again, I agree that there should&#39;ve been a bit of a better explanation around this decision!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillygirl</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>phillygirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>Quite the interesting read and this certainly generated a lot of comments ... as I think have all SA Blog Award posts in recent weeks.

I too attended the Cool Running event last year and as events go, it was fairly dull. I enjoy the process of being a finalist tho, if only to get my blog exposed to a wider audience.

I think the SA Blog Awards are pretty much a work-in-progress and each year some things improve and some stay the same. And it's only thru people discussing the flaws that things will improve.

I have to agree that I don't agree with Thought Leader being considered a "blog" ... I nominated a specific Thought Leader Blog in a certain (discarded) category and I think that's a far better approach. If Thought Leader itself should be a finalist (or winner) in any category it should be a category like: "Best SA Web Application for Weblogs" or similar.

I think there should definitely be more of a consensus regarding the award categories :) (I mean really, what kind of award system has a category for people writing about the awards?) 

And for what it's worth I think it's okay that some categories were discarded. If only one SA blog got nominated for a category, firstly: perhaps the category wasn't very well thought out and secondly: where's the competition, it kinda defeats the purpose. But then again, I agree that there should've been a bit of a better explanation around this decision!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite the interesting read and this certainly generated a lot of comments &#8230; as I think have all SA Blog Award posts in recent weeks.</p>
<p>I too attended the Cool Running event last year and as events go, it was fairly dull. I enjoy the process of being a finalist tho, if only to get my blog exposed to a wider audience.</p>
<p>I think the SA Blog Awards are pretty much a work-in-progress and each year some things improve and some stay the same. And it&#8217;s only thru people discussing the flaws that things will improve.</p>
<p>I have to agree that I don&#8217;t agree with Thought Leader being considered a &#8220;blog&#8221; &#8230; I nominated a specific Thought Leader Blog in a certain (discarded) category and I think that&#8217;s a far better approach. If Thought Leader itself should be a finalist (or winner) in any category it should be a category like: &#8220;Best SA Web Application for Weblogs&#8221; or similar.</p>
<p>I think there should definitely be more of a consensus regarding the award categories <img src='http://justinhartman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> (I mean really, what kind of award system has a category for people writing about the awards?) </p>
<p>And for what it&#8217;s worth I think it&#8217;s okay that some categories were discarded. If only one SA blog got nominated for a category, firstly: perhaps the category wasn&#8217;t very well thought out and secondly: where&#8217;s the competition, it kinda defeats the purpose. But then again, I agree that there should&#8217;ve been a bit of a better explanation around this decision!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Catto</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Catto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>@BAF &#187; Actually, I don&#39;t use pseudonyms on blogs. I didn&#39;t post the above question regarding my own blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BAF &raquo; Actually, I don&#39;t use pseudonyms on blogs. I didn&#39;t post the above question regarding my own blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Awards Fan</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-2599</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Awards Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2599</guid>
		<description>Richard Catto is just a jealous little prick with more than one pseudonym</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Catto is just a jealous little prick with more than one pseudonym</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Drew Patrick Eggworth</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-2598</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Drew Patrick Eggworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2598</guid>
		<description>Oh come on! What a waste of good processing power debating this. These awards are a complete and utter crock o&#39; SH*T. The majority of local blogs are utter rubbish (mine included) and these awards just perpetuate the myth of Web 2.00 stardom in the minds of a few deluded individuals. Wake up and smell the Java.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on! What a waste of good processing power debating this. These awards are a complete and utter crock o&#39; SH*T. The majority of local blogs are utter rubbish (mine included) and these awards just perpetuate the myth of Web 2.00 stardom in the minds of a few deluded individuals. Wake up and smell the Java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Catto</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Catto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>@BAF &#187; Actually, I don't use pseudonyms on blogs. I didn't post the above question regarding my own blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BAF &raquo; Actually, I don&#8217;t use pseudonyms on blogs. I didn&#8217;t post the above question regarding my own blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Awards Fan</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Awards Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>Richard Catto is just a jealous little prick with more than one pseudonym</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Catto is just a jealous little prick with more than one pseudonym</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Drew Patrick Eggworth</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Drew Patrick Eggworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>Oh come on! What a waste of good processing power debating this. These awards are a complete and utter crock o' SH*T. The majority of local blogs are utter rubbish (mine included) and these awards just perpetuate the myth of Web 2.00 stardom in the minds of a few deluded individuals. Wake up and smell the Java.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on! What a waste of good processing power debating this. These awards are a complete and utter crock o&#8217; SH*T. The majority of local blogs are utter rubbish (mine included) and these awards just perpetuate the myth of Web 2.00 stardom in the minds of a few deluded individuals. Wake up and smell the Java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Number 1 on Google! &#124; Cape Town news</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Number 1 on Google! &#124; Cape Town news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>[...] Justin Hartman spells it out more directly on his own personal blog: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Justin Hartman spells it out more directly on his own personal blog: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Maher &#187; SA Blog awards, where to from here?</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Maher &#187; SA Blog awards, where to from here?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>[...] it right. I had a rant typed out for my blog this weekend, in response to Justin Hartman&#8217;s tirade about the categorization of the nominees and the fact that Thought Leader was nominated for best SA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it right. I had a rant typed out for my blog this weekend, in response to Justin Hartman&#8217;s tirade about the categorization of the nominees and the fact that Thought Leader was nominated for best SA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expensive Mistakes and Cheap T</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-2597</link>
		<dc:creator>Expensive Mistakes and Cheap T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2597</guid>
		<description>when I asked if anyone knew what the prizes are, I was referring to the ten supposedly sponsored prizes mentioned on the SA Blog Awards site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when I asked if anyone knew what the prizes are, I was referring to the ten supposedly sponsored prizes mentioned on the SA Blog Awards site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expensive Mistakes and Cheap Thrills</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Expensive Mistakes and Cheap Thrills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>when I asked if anyone knew what the prizes are, I was referring to the ten supposedly sponsored prizes mentioned on the SA Blog Awards site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when I asked if anyone knew what the prizes are, I was referring to the ten supposedly sponsored prizes mentioned on the SA Blog Awards site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudolph</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2596</guid>
		<description>Although I think there can be vast improvement to many media awards in the tech space, the Blog awards and any other similar accolades does serve the purpose of promoting the industry.  I think many people â€“ including me on many occasions â€“ make the mistake to assume that the purpose of awards is always to discover and reward the best in its field.  This is only partly trueâ€¦  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To truly reward the best in the industry â€“ in whatever field â€“ is such a complex task that one should not expect this to easily happen.  Even with mainstream awards â€“ like the Telkom journalist of the Year awards â€“ many problems occur and controversial choices are made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I personally think that any awards process should involve readers, writers and industry experts â€“ assuming that there is a large enough user base.  With limited resources this is not possible, which is why many of the top blogs and podcasts are absent.  This however does not mean that the awards are useless â€“ just less accurate than what it can be.  The question really is how inaccurateâ€¦here I can not judgeâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I think there can be vast improvement to many media awards in the tech space, the Blog awards and any other similar accolades does serve the purpose of promoting the industry.  I think many people â€“ including me on many occasions â€“ make the mistake to assume that the purpose of awards is always to discover and reward the best in its field.  This is only partly trueâ€¦  </p>
<p>To truly reward the best in the industry â€“ in whatever field â€“ is such a complex task that one should not expect this to easily happen.  Even with mainstream awards â€“ like the Telkom journalist of the Year awards â€“ many problems occur and controversial choices are made.</p>
<p>I personally think that any awards process should involve readers, writers and industry experts â€“ assuming that there is a large enough user base.  With limited resources this is not possible, which is why many of the top blogs and podcasts are absent.  This however does not mean that the awards are useless â€“ just less accurate than what it can be.  The question really is how inaccurateâ€¦here I can not judgeâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudolph</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>Although I think there can be vast improvement to many media awards in the tech space, the Blog awards and any other similar accolades does serve the purpose of promoting the industry.  I think many people â€“ including me on many occasions â€“ make the mistake to assume that the purpose of awards is always to discover and reward the best in its field.  This is only partly trueâ€¦  

To truly reward the best in the industry â€“ in whatever field â€“ is such a complex task that one should not expect this to easily happen.  Even with mainstream awards â€“ like the Telkom journalist of the Year awards â€“ many problems occur and controversial choices are made.

I personally think that any awards process should involve readers, writers and industry experts â€“ assuming that there is a large enough user base.  With limited resources this is not possible, which is why many of the top blogs and podcasts are absent.  This however does not mean that the awards are useless â€“ just less accurate than what it can be.  The question really is how inaccurateâ€¦here I can not judgeâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I think there can be vast improvement to many media awards in the tech space, the Blog awards and any other similar accolades does serve the purpose of promoting the industry.  I think many people â€“ including me on many occasions â€“ make the mistake to assume that the purpose of awards is always to discover and reward the best in its field.  This is only partly trueâ€¦  </p>
<p>To truly reward the best in the industry â€“ in whatever field â€“ is such a complex task that one should not expect this to easily happen.  Even with mainstream awards â€“ like the Telkom journalist of the Year awards â€“ many problems occur and controversial choices are made.</p>
<p>I personally think that any awards process should involve readers, writers and industry experts â€“ assuming that there is a large enough user base.  With limited resources this is not possible, which is why many of the top blogs and podcasts are absent.  This however does not mean that the awards are useless â€“ just less accurate than what it can be.  The question really is how inaccurateâ€¦here I can not judgeâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>Great post Justin and I thought I&#39;d like to add my views as expressed by myself and other independent podcasters in South Africa.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The "Best SA Podcast" category for the SA Blog Awards.  The description clearly reads "Best independently produced video or audio podcast in SA".  It so happend that a huge number of the nomincations are clearly not independent podcasts and added to that, that one of the nominees, &lt;a href="http://2oceansvibe.com"&gt;2oceansvibe.com&lt;/a&gt; is not even a podcast, but a blog with embedded YouTube videos!   I was unable to locate the RSS feed for the Just Plain Darren podcast on the webiste and without that, it isn&#39;t considered a podcast. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am extremely greatful for my podcast getting a nomincation this year, but I think there should of been some form of obvious filtering done in this category, even if the public vote is the exclusive vote.  Jon has been made aware of this, but with the rules this year, is unable to do something about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Justin and I thought I&#39;d like to add my views as expressed by myself and other independent podcasters in South Africa.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Best SA Podcast&#8221; category for the SA Blog Awards.  The description clearly reads &#8220;Best independently produced video or audio podcast in SA&#8221;.  It so happend that a huge number of the nomincations are clearly not independent podcasts and added to that, that one of the nominees, <a href="http://2oceansvibe.com">2oceansvibe.com</a> is not even a podcast, but a blog with embedded YouTube videos!   I was unable to locate the RSS feed for the Just Plain Darren podcast on the webiste and without that, it isn&#39;t considered a podcast. </p>
<p>I am extremely greatful for my podcast getting a nomincation this year, but I think there should of been some form of obvious filtering done in this category, even if the public vote is the exclusive vote.  Jon has been made aware of this, but with the rules this year, is unable to do something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-2/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>Great post Justin and I thought I'd like to add my views as expressed by myself and other independent podcasters in South Africa.

The "Best SA Podcast" category for the SA Blog Awards.  The description clearly reads "Best independently produced video or audio podcast in SA".  It so happend that a huge number of the nomincations are clearly not independent podcasts and added to that, that one of the nominees, 2oceansvibe.com is not even a podcast, but a blog with embedded YouTube videos!   I was unable to locate the RSS feed for the Just Plain Darren podcast on the webiste and without that, it isn't considered a podcast. 

I am extremely greatful for my podcast getting a nomincation this year, but I think there should of been some form of obvious filtering done in this category, even if the public vote is the exclusive vote.  Jon has been made aware of this, but with the rules this year, is unable to do something about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Justin and I thought I&#8217;d like to add my views as expressed by myself and other independent podcasters in South Africa.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Best SA Podcast&#8221; category for the SA Blog Awards.  The description clearly reads &#8220;Best independently produced video or audio podcast in SA&#8221;.  It so happend that a huge number of the nomincations are clearly not independent podcasts and added to that, that one of the nominees, 2oceansvibe.com is not even a podcast, but a blog with embedded YouTube videos!   I was unable to locate the RSS feed for the Just Plain Darren podcast on the webiste and without that, it isn&#8217;t considered a podcast. </p>
<p>I am extremely greatful for my podcast getting a nomincation this year, but I think there should of been some form of obvious filtering done in this category, even if the public vote is the exclusive vote.  Jon has been made aware of this, but with the rules this year, is unable to do something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmk</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>gmk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>What should be a joyous time for the community to respect their peers and show [ thick enough cheese? ] we really care about everybody and our carbon footprint when the reality is our little blogowhatitsname is no bigger than coda&#39;s barge poll or David Bullards IQ. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every year you all get your knickers in a fat knot and make derogatory comments about other peoples mothers. When you have all finished with your annual self masturbatory flagellation of how important you all are let it dawn like a new rainbow nation that no-one other than the ones who run it or whine about it give a flaying faaaaark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should be a joyous time for the community to respect their peers and show [ thick enough cheese? ] we really care about everybody and our carbon footprint when the reality is our little blogowhatitsname is no bigger than coda&#39;s barge poll or David Bullards IQ. </p>
<p>Every year you all get your knickers in a fat knot and make derogatory comments about other peoples mothers. When you have all finished with your annual self masturbatory flagellation of how important you all are let it dawn like a new rainbow nation that no-one other than the ones who run it or whine about it give a flaying faaaaark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuberider</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-2593</link>
		<dc:creator>tuberider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2593</guid>
		<description>Hey why don&#39;t we set up a bad blog awards? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;as long as I win something that is. I want to be great.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey why don&#39;t we set up a bad blog awards? </p>
<p>as long as I win something that is. I want to be great.</p>
<p>Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coda</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>coda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>My barge pole is bigger than your barge pole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My barge pole is bigger than your barge pole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hartman</title>
		<link>http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-2591</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinhartman.com/2008/03/07/sa-blog-awards-wtf/#comment-2591</guid>
		<description>â€˜lack of quality nominationsâ€™ - that infuriates me.. I personally nominated for David Bullard and Bolton in the Most Controversial Blog as I felt they were both defining moments in the Bologosphere in 2007.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you telling me David Bullard is not a quality blog and that Bolton didn&#39;t highlight many key issues in our blogosphere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€˜lack of quality nominationsâ€™ - that infuriates me.. I personally nominated for David Bullard and Bolton in the Most Controversial Blog as I felt they were both defining moments in the Bologosphere in 2007.</p>
<p>Are you telling me David Bullard is not a quality blog and that Bolton didn&#39;t highlight many key issues in our blogosphere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
